Пирамиды не из бетона


Автор сообщения: gorm
Дата и время сообщения: 08 February 2009 at 00:42:35:

В ответ на сообщение: Re: !!!фоменку торренули!!!

Нашел замечательное исследование, которое, кажется, ставит точку в недавних
шумихах по поводу Давидовица и Барсоума.

Evidence from Detailed Petrographic Examinations of
Casing Stones from the Great Pyramid of Khufu, a Natural Limestone from
Tura, and a Man-made (Geopolymeric) Limestone
Dipayan Jana
Construction Materials Consultants, Inc. and
Applied Petrographic Services, Inc. Greensburg, PA 15601 USA
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-NINTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY QUEBEC CITY, PQ, CANADA MAY 20 -24, 2007, 207

Автор многими петрографическими методами исследует образцы пирамиды (из британского музея и тот же образец облицовки, что был предоставлен Давидовицу и Барсоуму профессором Лауэром), образцы известняка из турской каменоломни и образцы геополимерного известняка от Давидовица. И приходит к совершенно однозначным выводам:

This study conclusively demonstrates that there is absolutely no evidence of an alkalialuminosilicate-based composition in the binder phases of the casing stones, nor is there any evidence of “unusual” constituents in the pristine, bulk uncontaminated interior of the casing stones to call for a “man-made” origin. Despite the detection of a man-made “coating” on the Lauer casing stone, the stone itself is determined to be nothing but a high-quality natural
limestone mineralogically, texturally, and microstructurally similar to that found in the quarries at Tura-Masara.

Based on the present scientific proof of the absence of a “geopolymeric” signature or any “synthetic” composition in the same Lauer casing stone, originally used as a “smoking gun” to support the concrete-pyramid hypothesis, the proposed geopolymer hypotheses of Davidovits and others, or any “new” hypothesis for that matter really has no practical credibility (let alone their astounding extension to both core and casing blocks, and granite/granodiorite/basalt/travertine/quartzite blocks, columns, pavements, and other architectural artifacts associated with the Great Pyramids) unless detailed and systematic research is done by a diverse group of scientists on actual pyramid samples of known provenances. A valid hypothesis must rest upon a reliable set of unquestionable data.

Despite much reported evidence of the use of zeolitic (geopolymeric) chemistry in the ancient technologies, its promising future in the modern cast-stone technology and as innovative building materials for sustainable development, there is no evidence of use of geopolymeric cement in the pyramid stones. Based on unassailable field evidence in favor of a geologic origin for the pyramid stones, and equally convincing results of the present laboratory studies confirming the “geologic” origin of the casing stone samples from the Great Pyramid of Khufu (originally used as evidence for a man-made origin), the author is convinced that the Egyptian pyramids stand as testament to the unprecedented accuracy, craftsmanship, and engineering skills of the Old Kingdom (2500 BC) stone masons!

Примечательно, что блог Барсумане обновлялся с мая 2007 года, как раз с момента появления статьи.

Любопытно почитать было спор там Барсума с Archae Solenhofen, автором известного и неоднократно здесь всплывавшего сайта:
http://www.geocities.com/unforbidden_geology

Чем-то очень знакомым повеяло! В ответ на убедительные доводы с фактами и ссылками отвечает демагогией заглавными буквами!


2892. !!!фоменку торренули!!! - portvein777 15:09 06.02.09 (45)
К списку тем на странице